A5800 IRF is better than Cat3750-X Stackwise because of following reasons
1) Can be used in Access, Aggregation, Distribution, Core or Data Center Layer
A5800-IRF can be used in Access, Aggregation, Distribution or Data Center; Cat3750-X Stackwise can only be used in Access layer.
This is because of the fact that there are performance limitations on Cat3750-X which will prohibit one from any other usage besides access/campus layer.
Here are some key limitations of Cat3750-X
| Cat3750-X | A5800 |
Performance | 160Gbps | 280 Gbps |
Total VLAN | 1005 VLANs | 4094 VLANS |
Max # of MAC Entries | 4K (Access Mode) | 32K |
Max # of Routing Entries | 6K (Access Mode) | 16K |
Max # of GE Copper Ports | 48 | 80 |
Max # of GE Fiber Ports | 4 | 32 |
Max # of 10GE | 2 | 8 |
In fact, as per Cisco switch positioning guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/index.html#N2549C4
Cat4948 is much better than Cat3750-X for aggregation/distribution/Core/DC usage, but it does not support Stacking. Hence you lose all the advantages of Stacking
2) Merge two layers (access + aggregation/distribution) into one layer
With A5800-IRF you can merge two layers (access + aggregation/distribution/Core) into one layer; this is very difficult in Cat3750-X Stackwise because of Layer 3 functionality limitations
A5800-IRF provides all Layer 3 functionality which is needed in an aggregation/distribution/core layer. Some of the key functionalities which are missing in Cat3750-X Stackwise are
- Rapid Convergence Via Bi-Directional Forwarding Detection (BFD) RFC 5880 – Not supported on Cat3750-X Stackwise
- MPLS
- Campus-to-Campus or DC-to-DC Extension Via VPLS
- Layer 2 Segmentation via VPLS ; Cisco Stackwise uses Private-VLAN which does not scale beyond layer 2 domain and is proprietary
3) Cable limitations
Cat3750-X Stackwise needs a special cable and this limits its deployment. A5800-IRF uses normal ports on the switch to connect to other members in the group. This provides flexibility in terms of cable distances and member-to-member bandwidth
| Cat3750-X Stackwise | A5800 IRF |
Cable Type | Special Cable | Any GE/10GE Copper or Fiber cable will do |
Max Cable Distance | 150 Centimeters | Up to 70 Kms |
Max Bandwidth between members | 64 Gbps RX, 64 Gbps TX | Up to 80Gbps RX, 80 Gbps TX |
4) Licensing Costs
With Cat3750-X Stackwise you cannot mix and match a LAN-Base license with any other members in the stack. Thus one is either forced to have a dumb Layer-2 only Stack or have all members upgrade to at least IP-Base license. This adds to the cost significantly. More details on - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/qa_c67-578933.html
With A5800-IRF there are no premium licenses; Base level license has all the functionality
5) Stack Management
A5800-IRF is managed by a robust tool called Intelligent Management Center (IMC). Cisco Stackwise needs LAN Management System tool. There are several limitations with Cisco Stackwise Management
| Cisco LMS | HP Networking IMC |
Ability to manage all devices from Same company | No ; Only LAN switches ; Need to purchase other tools | Yes ; All HP Networking Devices |
Ability to manage devices from other vendors | No ; Only Cisco Switches | Yes ; Can manage 2000 different devices including Cisco, JNPR, FDRY etc |
FCAPS (Fault, Configure, Accounting, Performance, Security) Compliant | No | Yes |
Performance Monitoring | No Netflow on Cat3K | Yes |
Reference Material
Cisco 3750-X Data Sheet: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/data_sheet_c78-584733.html
No comments:
Post a Comment